Object: Any entity, whether natural or material, human or physical, tangible or abstract, moving or stationary, possessing its own resources or depending on resources from external sources, and interacting with another object to perform a specific desired function.

The TRIZ methodology has demonstrated that an object's mobility behavior is crucial for determining the solution when certain innovation parameters, such as weight, length, area, volume, energy usage, and duration, are involved. Therefore, it is essential to identify this state based on the following definitions:
Mobile Object S1: An object that can easily change its position in space in relation to Object S2, either by itself or as a result of external forces. If Object S1 appears stationary in relation to Object S2 and there is a desire for it to move, then Object S1 should be considered moving.
Stationary Object S1: An object that does not change its position in space in relation to Object S2, neither on its own nor due to external forces. If Object S1 moves along with Object S2, maintaining the relative position between them, then Object S1 can be considered stationary.
Moving or Stationary Object S2: The same definitions as above when interacting with Object S1.

The selection of Objects S1 and S2, which will be the focus of the evaluation, is a crucial decision based on a comprehensive study of the innovation challenge. The choice of Object S1 is particularly relevant as it will be used to identify undesirable effects that affect the achievement of the desired goal proposed for the innovation challenge. In case of uncertainty, it is recommended to initially select as Object S1 the one that, according to the knowledge of the current situation, appears to have the most potential for experiencing changes and presents more evidence of undesirable effects. For a given selection, the roles of S1 and S2 can also be reversed, requiring a new identification of undesirable effects associated with the new Object S1.
Any object identified in the functional diagram can be selected as Object S1 to formulate the innovation challenge. It is recommended to form pairs of objects to analyze different selection alternatives. These pairs of objects can consist of individual objects identified in the diagram or a group of objects grouped based on a common purpose.

Example of pairs of objects analyzed for the complex case of the sinking of the Estonia ferry, as shown in Topic 2

Pair of Objects A:
[Cargo Space Sb] [Ferry Sa] Water enters the cargo space, destabilizing the ferry and causing it to capsize. Here, the first challenge arises: How to prevent water from entering the cargo space and destabilizing the ferry?

Pair of Objects B:
[Door-Visor Sc+Se+Sf] [Cargo Space Sb] Now the challenge is: How to prevent water from entering the cargo space in the event of a failure in the Door-Visor?

Pair of Objects C:
[Cylindrical Locking Pin Se of Door-Visor Sc] [Male-Female Parts Sf of Door-Visor Sc] In this instance, the goal is to prevent the Pin from wearing out due to its interaction with the male-female parts, allowing water to enter the ferry.

Pair of Objects D:
[Operator of Pin Sg Door-Visor Sc] [Cylindrical Locking Pin Se Door-Visor Sc] It is unlikely that the Operator will take actions to control Pin wear since the possibility of wear is accepted as part of the Pin's design compromise or engineering trade-off.

Pair of Objects E:
[Unstable Sea Sd] [Door-Visor Sc] Finally, we could evaluate: How to prevent the unstable sea from reaching the Door-Visor, making it impossible for water to leak into the ferry?.

Examples of solutions to the indicated pairs of objects:

All the questions posed above are valid. Each pair of objects is associated with undesirable effects that impact directly or indirectly, and the associated solution will improve the affected main function: if any of these questions is solved, the ferry capsizing is prevented.
For this ferry case, solutions have been found for two pairs of objects identified above.
Solution 1:
Solution for Pair of Objects A, with Object S1: Cargo Space and Object S2: Ferry, as shown in the publication by Souchkov, Valeri, (updated 2010), "Root Conflict Analysis (RCA+): Structured Problems and Contradictions Mapping," proposes a solution to this challenge by filling the empty cargo spaces with foam or airbags to prevent water accumulation inside the cargo space, thereby avoiding destabilizing the ferry, which could lead to capsizing and sinking. This solution is detailed in the Extended Manual provided on this site, as linked above, applying Nature's L.I. and its aatrizinventor algorithm. See Extended Manual Topic 15. Build a Specific Solution, Case D.1.
Solution 2:
Another solution found in the literature is for Pair of Objects B, with Object S1: Cylindrical Locking Pin of Door-Visor and Object S2: Male-Female Parts of Door-Visor, as described in the book by Rantanen, Kalevi & Domb, Ellen, (2008), 'Simplified TRIZ?, which outlines a rather simple solution to this problem patented in the 1990s (yes, in the last decade of the 20th century, not in the 19th century), involving the use of a conical pin to replace the cylindrical one. This solution is detailed in the Extended Manual provided on this site, as linked above, applying Nature's L.I. and its aatrizinventor algorithm. See Manual Topic 15. Build a Specific Solution, Case D.2.
As can be seen, formulating an innovation challenge to find the optimal solution is a significant task for the Innovation Team, requiring in-depth knowledge of the current situation.

6.1 Universal Innovation Parameters

Nature's L.I. utilizes the 39 innovation parameters from TRIZ, with a universal description, divided into 24 innovation parameters for undesirable effects and 10 for needs to satisfy, separated for moving Object S1 and stationary Object S1. They are shown below.

6.2 Innovation Parameters for Undesirable Effects and Selection Criteria

The innovation parameters (24) applied by Nature's L.I. to represent undesirable effects of an Object S1 in an innovation challenge have their origin in the classic definition by its creator Genrich Altshuller. Now, Nature's L.I. provides them with a universal description that facilitates their use in any realm of nature and human development, beyond their deduced origin from engineering.
The large number of exercises conducted with the Aatrizinventor algorithm has allowed us to validate the new descriptions and recognize the permanent validity of the classic TRIZ Contradiction Matrix as a permanent source of innovative solutions.
It is true that this matrix has been questioned by several innovators, some of whom have even redefined certain parameters and inventive principles to address specific contradictions. However, in light of the results obtained with aatrizinventor, these redefinitions are simply particular interpretations of particular cases, which in no case replace the proven universality of the classic TRIZ contradiction matrix.
Continuing with the parameters, in the link shown at the top, in the first section, descriptions are provided for the innovation parameters that can be associated with undesirable effects (UDE), along with guidance on how to relate them to undesirable effects that may arise based on in-depth knowledge of the evaluated current situation. These descriptions apply regardless of the type of innovation chosen: evolution, imagination, or imposition.

The logic for detecting undesirable effects is as follows: an evaluation space-time is established, and for each innovation parameter for undesirable effects (24), the question is whether it is possible to associate it with an undesirable effect present in the innovation challenge.
For each innovation parameter that can be associated with an undesirable effect, four validation criteria are recommended for the evaluator to decide whether to include it in the evaluation, as indicated below:

a) Critical Effect: There is objective evidence that the undesirable effect is present and significant in the innovation challenge, so the associated innovation parameter should be selected for evaluation.

b) Non-Relevant Effect: There is some evidence of its presence in the innovation challenge, but a logical analysis suggests that it may not be as significant, potentially leading the solution in a distorted direction by giving it more importance than it deserves. In doubt, do not select the associated innovation parameter. If the solution obtained without this effect is unsatisfactory, you can reconsider your decision and re-evaluate.

c) Negligible Effect: There is no evidence of its presence in the innovation challenge, so the possible innovation parameter associated with it should not be selected.

d) Accepted Effect: There is evidence that an undesirable effect is present in the innovation challenge, but the Innovation Team decides to accept its behavior, allowing the solution to have this degree of freedom.
e)Protected Effect: There is a situation that occurs especially in chained innovation processes, where in the first stage, there is an undesirable effect parameter that is improved. In the second stage, there are other related parameters that need improvement and could affect the already improved parameter. In these cases, consider including this latter parameter in the evaluation to further improve it or preserve the improvement already achieved.

To propose a solution to an innovation challenge, the aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to provide the following information:
Identify the undesirable effects present in the innovation challenge under evaluation, up to a maximum of 7 parameters. Practical experience suggests that typically between 3 and 7 parameters are detected, which the algorithm can process in sets of 4 at a time. If you obtain more than 7, you should first check the evaluation space-time; it could be the case that certain effects occur outside the defined space-time, either partially or entirely, and therefore should not be considered. If that is not the case, you should reduce the space-time to be evaluated, as you may be combining different challenges.
As an example, Topic 8 of the Extended Manual provides selection tables for parameters of undesirable effects. Remember, practice makes perfect.

6.3 Innovation Parameters for Needs to Satisfy

The innovation parameters (10) applied by Nature's L.I. to represent needs to Satisfy for an Object S1 in an innovation challenge, as shown in the table above, also have their origin in the classic definition by its creator Genrich Altshuller, which Nature's L.I. provides with a universal description that facilitates their use in any realm of nature and human development, beyond their deduced origin from engineering.
A need to satisfy for an Object S1 evaluated is understood as a quality to be achieved in an evolutionary process of satisfaction. It begins with the ease of operation, the ability to change, and achieving the desired result. It continues with optimal resource management in productivity and efficient energy use. It goes on to being perceived as reliable and adaptable or versatile in behavior and its relationship with Object S2. Finally, it achieves autonomy in action or automation to reach a stable condition of permanent satisfaction.

To propose a solution to an innovation challenge, the aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to provide the following information:
Select the need to satisfy that you want to improve based on a deep understanding of the current situation.
It is important to recognize that the decision to select the need to satisfy will depend on the knowledge of the current situation's evolutionary state. However, this decision can be influenced by the experience, paradigms, and desires of the Innovation Team, which may not always align with the best practices of the language of nature's innovation. This discrepancy could lead to a solution that is not understandable to the Innovation Team, which could be wrongly attributed to the aatrizinventor algorithm.
To support the Innovation team's decision, the algorithm performs a sensitivity analysis that includes up to 7 undesirable effects and 10 possible needs to satisfy. This allows up to 350 solution alternatives to be evaluated in a single run of the algorithm, selecting the 10 best weighted ones to include in the aforementioned report, to be considered by the Innovation Team.

In this way, through two or three runs of the algorithm, it is possible to obtain an innovative solution for the evaluated innovation challenge. This solution is expected to have minimal cost and maximum benefit-to-cost ratio.

6.4 Inventive Principles

Nature's Language of Innovation resolves contradictions using the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix, using inventive principles shown below.

Nature's Language of Innovation has added a new property to the inventive principles: Strategic, Tactical and Operational, which are defined according to the participation they have in the 1248 contradictions identified by TRIZ.

Nature's Language of Innovation postulates that there is a 5x5 contradiction matrix that solves the innovation challenge or existing problem, delivering a solution of minimum cost and maximum benefit / cost ratio. As an example, below is a specific matrix that has been deduced for 'Improve service of hot coffee in a plastic cup affected by burning the Customers' hand'. The matrix shows the undesirable effects, expressed as TRIZ innovation parameters: 1,23,29,25, and the desirable effect or need to satisfy, also as TRIZ innovation parameter: 13. In each cell the inventive principles that solve the contradiction between each pair of parameters are shown.

Specific Contradiction Matrix to Improve Service of hot coffee in a plastic cup with a Need to Satisfy: Stability

Additionally, there is the matrix of contradictions between the selected need to satisfy, 13. Stability in this case, and the other defined needs to

Matrix between Needs to Satisfy to Improve Hot coffee service in a plastic cup for Needs to Satisfy: Stability

This simple example of drinking hot coffee in a plastic cup will demonstrate how Nature's L.I. solves business problems using a universal description of TRIZ inventive principles and parameters, the original description of which has an engineering bias. The universal descriptions that are provided facilitate the solution of innovation challenges in any field of knowledge and can explain the innovation-evolution processes of nature, as a continuous solution of needs to satisfy. Nothing is spontaneous or random, everything has a reason: the current situation will determine the future and this in turn will condition the next.

Example for Case: Improve the Service of Hot Coffee in a Plastic Cup that Burns the Customer's Hand
At this Topic, we summarize the work of formulating the innovation challenge that the Innovation Team must conduct before using the Aatrizinventor Algorithm. Reviewing and ensuring conformity with the formulated logic is key to obtaining a suitable solution for the innovation challenge.

7.1 Functional Diagram of Objects

7.2 Selection of Undesirable Effects

7.3 Selection of Desirable Effect

For the evaluation, a desirable effect must be selected from among the 10 defined. Deciding on the desirable effect is a statement of intent regarding the state of innovation-evolution one wishes to achieve. The already identified undesirable effects should enable the Innovation Team to estimate the current state of innovation-evolution. Based on this, the selected desirable effect can be justified to attain a solution. However, the mentioned selection exercise does not always lead to the optimal solution.
Anticipating this, the Aatrizinventor algorithm assists the Innovation Team by conducting a sensitivity analysis for various combinations of selected undesirable effects and the 10 possible desirable effects. The analysis performed by the algorithm allows for proposing alternative solutions for the Innovation Team's decision.

It is highly recommended to review 2 or 3 alternative solutions with an open mind, without preconceptions. This approach may reveal pleasantly surprising solutions.

As an example, in a preliminary approach to the case of hot coffee in a plastic cup, due to an engineer's bias, the variables of coffee temperature (parameter 17) and the damage it caused by burning the customer's hand (parameter 31) were prioritized, directing the innovation challenge towards people's safety. However, the sensitivity analysis prioritized a different combination of parameters, shifting the main focus towards business outcomes, i.e., improving (reducing) sales losses and mitigating time loss due to the rejection of plastic cups with hot coffee. In other words, increasing sales and improving product turnover.

7.4 Modified Multiple Variable Evaporation Cloud for Recommended Solution

The previous work shown allows you to have all the necessary information to enter into the Aatrizinventor algorithm. You can enter up to 7 innovation parameters for undesirable effects, up to 4 for evaluation and up to 3 for sensitivity analysis. 1 innovation parameter is entered for need to satisfy and the remaining 9 are left for sensitivity analysis. Thus, the aatrizinventor algorithm evaluates 350 alternative solutions and recommends the 10 bests. The details of entering this information can be seen below.

a. Information Entry

STEP 1: OBJECTIVE AND INTERACTING OBJECTS

STEP 2: OBJECTIVE AFFECTED BY UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS CAUSES OF DISSATISFACTION

STEP 3: PHYSICAL VARIABLE OR CHARACTERISTIC OF UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS CAUSES OF DISSATISFACTION

STEP 4: PHYSICAL VARIABLE OR CHARACTERISTIC OF DESIRABLE EFFECT CAUSE OF SATISFACTION AND ASSOCIATED TRIZ PARAMETER

STEP 5: OBJECTIVE EXPECTED DUE TO DESIRABLE EFFECT CAUSE OF SATISFACTION

Before obtaining the solution through the Aatrizinventor algorithm, it is advisable to conduct a preliminary analysis of the formulated logic for addressing the innovation challenge under evaluation. In other words, it is necessary to review that the selected undesirable effects are consistent with the innovation challenge and are indeed affecting the sought-after objective of the innovation. Once the information entry is completed, by clicking on "Review Logic," included at the end of Step 5, the algorithm will generate a report called "Nature's L.I. Formulation Logic Summary," as shown below. It is essential for the Innovation Team to carefully read this report. If the Innovation Team agrees with the logic presented in the report, then it is recommended to proceed with the process to obtain a solution.
Example of Logic Summary for the case of serving hot coffee in a Plastic Cup:

In case of finding inconsistencies or errors in the report, it is necessary to go back and make the necessary corrections. The logic analysis report should be generated again, and once the Innovation Team definitively accepts the report, they will be in an appropriate position to request the solution.
It is crucial to note that reviewing and eventually correcting the formulation logic are key steps before proceeding to obtain a suitable solution for the evaluated case. These steps ensure that the formulation of the innovation challenge and its undesirable effects are coherent and appropriate, thereby maximizing the certainty of the obtained solution.
Additionally, it is important to highlight that the logical formulation of the innovation challenge is a necessary but not sufficient step to obtain an optimal solution. For this reason, the algorithm performs a sensitivity analysis, as explained in Topic 6 and as shown in the example in the following Topic 10.

Once the required information has been entered to obtain a solution, you must enter the registered username and password and click the "Aatrizinventor Solution" button. This action will display the report: AATRIZINVENTOR SOLUTION REPORT.
This report contains all the necessary information to obtain a solution for the assessed challenge. It is divided into tables I, II, III, IV, V, VII, VII, VIII, and IX, which provide relevant information for the solution. The following explains the content of each table and what useful information it provides, with which the algorithm forms the solution.
The tables shown here as an example correspond to the challenge of improving the Hot Coffee in Plastic Cup Service, affected by burning the hand of customers. This report begins with the detail of the information entered into the Aatrizinventor Algorithm. All the information required for this report can be written as the User wishes, to safeguard the privacy of the analysis. In particular, the explanation of the selected undesirable effects for evaluation is presented in the report in a generic manner, as the actual information is managed only in the User's Server environment.

Table I presents the innovation parameters selected to evaluate the challenge that must be resolved for the interaction between an Object S1 and an Object S2, and no more. The selection of undesirable effects should be based on a thorough review of the current situation, identifying them based on the objective evidence present within the predefined space and time of evaluation. Meeting this requirement is crucial: If you don't connect the dots of the current situation well, the algorithm will provide an incoherent solution.
The choice of the need to satisfy should reflect the best estimate of the state of innovation-evolution of Object S1 being evaluated. Recognizing the criticality of this selection process, the Aatrizinventor algorithm provides flexibility to change parameters and conducts a sensitivity analysis to offer alternative solutions. These alternatives are based on different combinations of the parameters entered with all defined needs to satisfy. A total of 350 solution alternatives are analyzed. See Item 10.6.

Table I: Innovation Parameters Under Evaluation

Below is Table II, which shows the evaluation of the contradictions formed between the innovation parameters selected by the Innovation Team for evaluation, as detailed in Table I. These parameters are related to the undesirable effects and corresponding needs to satisfy, allowing for the determination of the Base Solution.

It is important to note that this table does not include the innovation parameters intended for sensitivity analysis, whose participation depends on the sensitivity displayed in Table VI. Therefore, what is presented is a preliminary result based on the knowledge possessed by the Innovation Team to address the evaluated challenge.

Practice teaches us that it is desirable that this first selection of parameters should be part of the solutions recommended by the sensitivity analysis conducted by the Aatrizinventor algorithm, which will be seen in Table VI below. If this does not occur, the interpretation of this first solution could be more complicated for its effective implementation and it may be necessary to apply a new combination of parameters to evaluate. The final Base Solution chosen will determine the direction of the recommended solution.

All the contradictions shown in Table II have an empirically calculated weight, identified as wt.i. Contradiction wt.1 is called the essential contradiction and is highlighted with the abbreviation 'Es,' and it can be found in any position of the matrix. The four heaviest contradictions located in the row and column of the preferred parameters are referred to as complementary contradictions and are indicated with 'Compl.' These five contradictions make up the Base Solution presented in Table III.

Additionally, the Top5 contradictions that are outside the row and column of the preferred parameters are highlighted. It is essential to take them into account as they may contain additional inventive principles that need to be included in the final solution, which will be defined in Table V.

The Recommended Solution by the algorithm consists of the Base Solution and the Solution Among Needs to Satisfy. The latter consists of a selection extracted from the contradictions between the evaluated need to satisfy and the other defined needs to satisfy, as detailed in Table IV. The Recommended Solution is available in Table V.

Finally, it is important to mention that there are inventive principles present in Table II, whether in the Top5 or other locations, which are not part of the Recommended Solution. In Table V, the three most relevant principles identified, along with the associated contradictions, are shown for the purpose of evaluating if they contribute significant aspects to the desired solution. For more detailed information on the incidence of inventive principles in Table II, as well as to identify all those that do not participate in the Recommended Solution in Table V, you can consult Table VIII.

10.2 Table II: Base Solution Contradiction Matrix

Here is Table III, which is an excerpt from Table II, showing only the essential contradiction and the 4 complementary contradictions that make up the Base Solution.
In the essential contradiction marked with 'Es,' inventive principles are highlighted, and some of these principles are repeated in certain complementary contradictions. This repetition helps reduce the inventive principles that need to be integrated coherently to establish a specific solution.

A list of participating inventive principles is also provided in Table III, indicating their type: Strategic, Tactical, or Operational. Operational principles, along with tactical ones, offer more specific initial guidance. For example, in the case of "Hot Coffee Service in a Plastic Cup Affected by Burning Customers' Hands," as shown here, these principles already provide some significant and coherent signals for defining a solution:
PI.18 Vibrations/Energy Variations, Tactical, indicating the need for a cyclical movement between the Plastic Cup and the customer: 'take it, release it.'.
PI.20 Continuity of Useful Action, Operational, suggesting an improvement in the continuity of the service.
PI.5 Merging/Separating, Operational, indicating that the Plastic Cup should be merged with another object to enhance the interaction between the Plastic Cup and the customer.
PI.31 Using/Removing Unused Parts, Operational, suggesting the need to use some unused part of the Plastic Cup.
This initial analysis already reveals a trend, with the inventive principles from the contradictions between needs to satisfy yet to be considered, as they are selected in Table IV.
In another case, if applying the above exercise makes it difficult to project a solution, it is recommended to review the results of the sensitivity analysis and consider another alternative. If you have correctly selected innovation parameters representing the identified undesirable effects for the evaluated case, it can be asserted that there is a possible optimal solution. On average, 2 or 3 additional evaluations will lead to the optimal solution. If you are unsure about a parameter, evaluate with and without it. Sometimes, this simple exercise will enough.

10.3 Tabla III Base Solution

Here is Table IV, which displays the Contradiction Matrix between Needs to Satisfy and the Optimization Strategy.

Table IV serves two simultaneous objectives. First, it aims to solve contradictions between the evaluated need to satisfy and the other defined needs. The logic behind this is that the improvement of the evaluated need to satisfy should not worsen the performance of the other ones. Therefore, these contradictions need to be addressed and solved.

Secondly, this stage must adhere to the hypothesis of optimizing the solution to the evaluated challenge, which posits that the most promising solution is one in which the inventive principles present in Table II cover a higher percentage of the inventive principles participating in Table IV.

To determine the optimal solution, the coverage percentage is calculated for the evaluated case, and it is sought to have no more than three contradictions containing inventive principles not included in Table II. This is an iterative process, supported by alternative combinations of innovation parameters proposed by the sensitivity analysis explained in Table VI. The Aatrizinventor algorithm suggests that these up to three contradictions constitute the solution between needs to satisfy, which, together with the Base Solution, gives rise to the Recommended Solution for the evaluated innovation challenge, as shown in Table V.

list of participating inventive principles in the selected contradictions from Table IV is also provided, indicating their type: Strategic, Tactical, or Operational. Operational principles, along with tactical ones, offer more specific complementary guidance. For example, in the case of "Hot Coffee Service in a Plastic Cup Affected by Burning Customers' Hands," as shown here, these principles provide significant and coherent specific signals considering the innovation parameters that originate the contradictions they participate in.

10.4 Table IV Solution between Needs to Satisfy

Once again, upon reviewing the tactical and operational inventive principles, they provide indications on where to direct the solution
PI.8. Anti-Weight/ Compensation - tactical type, which suggests offsetting the temperature affecting the Customer by combining the Plastic Cup with another object,
PI.30. Simple Shapes/ Ways to Interact - tactical type, which proposes using a thin flexible sheet to isolate the temperature affecting the Customer,
PI.34. Discarding and Recovering - actical type, indicating that the flexible sheet should be used and then discarded, followed by the recovery of a new one,
PI.16. Partial or Excessive Actions - operational type, and finally, making the solution adjustable, "a little more, a little less, 'in other words, the "never well-pondered theory of oscillating digits.'.

As seen, the Base Solution and the Solution between Needs to Satisfy gradually provide meaningful concepts to form the Recommended Solution that the Aatrizinventor algorithm will provide, always based on the knowledge of the current situation.

If Table IV contains more than 3 contradictions with inventive principles not included in Table II (nT2), then it is likely to be more challenging to construct a specific solution. In such cases, it is recommended to seek an alternative combination of parameters in Table VI of the sensitivity analysis. Choosing another need to be satisfied, as shown in Table VII Essential Contradictions of Needs to Satisfy (NS) for the same evaluated undesirable effects for Plastic Cup, is also an option.

To evaluate the recommended inventive principles here and the corresponding contradictions (up to 3) they participate in, the Base Solution must guide an initial context of the solution, as the contradictions between needs to satisfy do not identify which variable, property or characteristic of the object S1 must be improved.

Inventive principles marked with nT3 are included in Table II but do not participate in the Recommended Solution shown in Table V. The Innovation Team should review the contradictions where these principles participate to determine if there are other specific aspects that could be significant for the solution or to confirm the projected solution.
Unmarked inventive principles are included in Table II Specific Contradiction Matrix and in Table V Recommended Solution.

Next, we present Table V, which displays the Recommended Solution selected for the evaluated innovation challenge. This solution should result from a rigorous analysis of the available alternatives, including the innovation team's proposal and the alternatives recommended by the sensitivity analysis.
In this table, the participation of inventive principles belonging to essential contradictions marked with 'Es' is highlighted.
A list of all inventive principles participating in this table is also shown, indicating their type: Strategic, Tactical, or Operational.
Moreover, for each inventive principle, a summary of the defining innovation concepts is provided. With these concepts, the Specific Solution for the evaluated challenge should be derived, integrating the strategic, tactical, and operational inventive principles contained in the aforementioned list. We recommend an 'integrated specific reading' of inventive principles per contradiction, applying relational thinking skills.

10.5 Table V Recommended Solution

Inventive Principles Included in the Recommended Solution

To develop a Specific Solution based on the contradictions provided in Table V, where S1: Plastic Cup interacts with S2: CUSTOMERS, the Innovation Team must analyze the selected inventive principles listed below. This involves reviewing all the innovation concepts recommended by each of these principles. An initial practical exercise is to choose at least one concept from each principle that is applicable to the challenge under evaluation.
Once the concepts per inventive principle have been selected, it is essential to conduct an 'integrated specific reading' for the contradictions indicated in Table V. If this recommended reading can demonstrate a coherent logical thread with the evaluated case for each selected contradiction and for the set of recommended contradictions, then it can be considered that there is a possible innovation solution.
To complete the definition of the specific solution, it is necessary to review the relevant inventive principles from Table II that were not included in the Recommended Solution in Table V, which are presented above.
For more details on the recommended contradictions, you can refer to the complete descriptions of the inventive principles by contradiction, as shown in Table IX.
In Topic 11 of this Starter Manual, an example is provided to develop the Specific Solution from the Recommended Solution generated by the Aatrizinventor algorithm, based on the 'Nature's Language of Innovation.' Identifying a specific solution is a systematic and iterative process that involves multiple concepts and seeks to determine a comprehensive solution with minimal implementation cost and maximum benefit-to-cost ratio.
In the inventive principles described below, an asterisk (*) has been added to the name of the object under evaluation. This is done to remind us that the descriptions of the inventive principles consider that the Plastic Cup can maintain its current physical or functional state, change to a modified state, or even transition to a new state, as needed to achieve the desired goal.
Please make the most of your relational thinking skills.

The summarized descriptions of the Inventive Principles included in the Recommended Solution, shown below, should be applied to the evaluated challenge for the defined space and time, within which the undesirable effects that have been evaluated were identified. Remember, not all the concepts described below apply to finding the desired solution. Knowledge of the actual, real, imagined, or imposed situation will guide this selection:

Below is a summarized description of the inventive principles included in the recommended solution shown above. As an example, the innovation concepts selected by the Innovation Team to build the solution are highlighted. This underlining is not included in the Aatrizinventor Innovation Report:

Essential contradiction
Improve: (+) 23. Loss of substance and Attenuate or Preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
IP.15. Dynamics - strategic type (1)
a. Allow (or design) the characteristics of PLASTIC CUP*, external environment, or process to change to an optimal, or to find an optimal, operating condition.
b. Divide PLASTIC CUP* into parts that are capable of relative movement between each other.
c. If PLASTIC CUP* (or process) is rigid or inflexible, make it flexible or adaptive.
d. To enhance the dynamics of PLASTIC CUP* or the process, use feature(s) or object(s) available in the nearby environment.
IP.18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations - tactical type (2)
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it.
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic).Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations.
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its parts or functions.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (3)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.10. Preliminary Action - strategic type (4)
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.

Complementary contradiction #1
Improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object and Attenuate or Preserve: (-) 29. Fulfillment of desired outcome
IP.28. Mechanics Substitution - strategic type (5)
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with fi eld-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (6)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.26. Copying/ Replicating - strategic type (7)
a. Instead of using PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its unavailable, expensive, fragile parts or properties, use simpler and inexpensive copies or replicates to perform the desired function and, if possible, with improved characteristics and properties, while disregarding the harmful, undesirable, or unnecessary ones.
b. Imitate PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its parts or properties, leveraging the relevant available environment.
c. If simple copies, or replicates are already being used, apply copies, or replicates of a higher level or technical.
IP.18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations - tactical type (8)
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it.
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic). Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations.
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its parts or functions.

Complementary contradiction #2
Improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object and Attenuate or Preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
IP.10. Preliminary Action - strategic type (9)
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (10)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.20. Continuity of Useful Action - operative type (11)
a. Make sure work is executed on continuously with PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Make all parts of PLASTIC CUP* work at full load, all the time.
c. Eliminate all idle or intermittent actions or work of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.28. Mechanics Substitution - strategic type (12)
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with fi eld-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.

Complementary contradiction #3
Improve: (-) 29. Fulfillment of desired outcome and Attenuate or Preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
IP.32. Perception/ Appearance/ Color Changes - strategic type (13)
a. Change how is perceived, the appearance or shape of PLASTIC CUP* in relation to the object S2with which it interacts.
b. Change the color, or appearance, of PLASTIC CUP* or its external environment.
c. Change the transparency of PLASTIC CUP* or its external environment.
IP.26. Copying/ Replicating - strategic type (14)
a. Instead of using PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its unavailable, expensive, fragile parts or properties, use simpler and inexpensive copies or replicates to perform the desired function and, if possible, does with improved characteristics and properties, while disregarding the harmful, undesirable, or unnecessary ones.
b. Imitate PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its parts or properties, leveraging the relevant available environment.
c. If simple copies, or replicates are already being used, apply copies, or replicates of a higher level or technical.
IP.28. Mechanics Substitution - strategic type (15)
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with fi eld-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations - tactical type (16)
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it.
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic).Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations.
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its parts or functions.

Complementary contradiction #4
Improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object and Attenuate or Preserve: (+) 23. Loss of substance
IP.5. Merging/ Separating - operative type (17)
a. Bring PLASTIC CUP* closer or merge with other objects with similar or identical operations or functions.
b. Bring PLASTIC CUP* closer or merge with other objects with similar operations or functions for them to act together at the same time.
c. Merge different shapes or actions into PLASTIC CUP*.
d. If there are objects fused to PLASTIC CUP, and if necessary, apply a separation action.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (18)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.3. Local Quality - strategic type (19)
a. Improve quality in a localized way, for parts, components, or conditions of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Change the structure, action, or procedure of PLASTIC CUP* from uniform to non-uniform, or vice versa.
c. Change the external environment (or external influence) of PLASTIC CUP* from uniform to non-uniform, or vice versa.
d. Make each part of PLASTIC CUP* function in the conditions that are most suitable for its operation.
e. Make each part of PLASTIC CUP* fulfill a different and useful function.
IP.31. Using/ Removing Unused Parts - operative type (20)
a. Take advantage of unused parts of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Remove or do not use unnecessary parts of PLASTIC CUP*.

Contradiction between Needs to Satisfy #1
Improve: 13. Stability and Preserve: 38. Extent of automation/ autonomy
IP.1. Segmenting/ Integrating - strategic type (21)
a. Divide PLASTIC CUP* into existing and/or new parts, shapes, phases, states, or conditions.
b. Integrate different existing or new parts, forms, phases, states or conditions of PLASTIC CUP* in a single entity. c. Make PLASTIC CUP* easy to disassemble or assemble.
d. Increase or reduce the degree of fragmentation or segmentation of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.8. Anti-Weight/ Compensation - tactical type (22)
a. To compensate for the heaviness/lightness or incidence of PLASTIC CUP*, merge it with other objects or independent own parts that provide an effect to improve the current situation.
b. To compensate for the heaviness/lightness or incidence of PLASTIC CUP*, make it interact with the environment.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (23) a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.

Contradiction between Needs to Satisfy #2
N°7 Improve: 13. Stability and Preserve: 35. Adaptability or versatility
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (24)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.30. Simple Shapes/ Ways to Interact - tactical type (25)
a. Use flexible rods and ropes, or similar one-dimensional functionality, or shells and thin films, or similar two-dimensional functionality, for PLASTIC CUP*, instead of complex three-dimensional structures, in type and number of components and shapes.
b. Separate/isolate PLASTIC CUP* from the external environment with simple shapes, using flexible rods and ropes, or similar one-dimensional, or shells and thin films, or similar two-dimensional.
c. Use in or for PLASTIC CUP* simple forms or ways of interacting with object S2, in one or two dimensions, with other dimensions reduced to a minimum. This is in order to reduce the number of resources and actions necessary to achieve the desired objective.
IP.34. Discarding and Recovering - tactical type (26)
a. Make portions of PLASTIC CUP*, which have fulfilled their functions or are unnecessary, go away(discard by absorption, dissolving, evaporating, etc.).
b. Conversely, restore consumable parts of PLASTIC CUP* directly in operation.
IP.2. Taking out/ Adding - strategic type (27)
a. Separate an interfering part or a property from PLASTIC CUP*, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Add new parts or properties to PLASTIC CUP*.

Contradiction between Needs to Satisfy #3
N°8 Improve: 13. Stability and Preserve: 34. Ease of change, repair or maintain
IP.2. Taking out/ Adding - strategic type (28)
a. Separate an interfering part or a property from PLASTIC CUP*, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Add new parts or properties to PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.35. Transformation / Parameter Changes - strategic type (29)
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.10. Preliminary Action - strategic type (30)
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.
IP.16. Partial or Excessive Actions - operative type (31)
a. If the objective of PLASTIC CUP* in its interaction with CUSTOMERS is difficult to fully achieve using a given solution, then use 'a little less' or 'a little more' of the same solution.

Specific analysis for each case
Relevant inventive principles from Table II not included in Recommended Solution
IP.24. Intermediary (Pos.(8) - tactical type (32)
a. for PLASTIC CUP*, use an intermediary carrier article or intermediary process.
b. Merge PLASTIC CUP* temporarily with another object (which can be easily removed or removed by itself).
IP.21. Skipping/ Avoiding (Pos.(10) - tactical type (33)
a. Make sure that with PLASTIC CUP*, the process, or certain stages (e.g., destructible, harmful, or hazardous operations), are conducted at high speed or during a minimum time of exposure to the risk.
b. Eventually, skip certain process stages PLASTIC CUP*.
IP.14. Spheroidality - Curvature - Angle (Pos.(14) - tactical type(34)
a. For the interaction between PLASTIC CUP* and Object S2, instead of using rectilinear parts, surfaces, or shapes, use curvilinear, enveloping, or angled parts.
b. For the interaction between PLASTIC CUP* and Object S2, instead of acting in a linear or direct way, interact in an indirect way or with curvilinear, surrounding, or angled movements.
c. Move PLASTIC CUP* from flat to spherical surfaces; from parts shaped as a cube (parallelepiped)to ball-shaped structures.
d. Use rolls, balls, spirals, domes in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
e. Go from linear to rotary motion, use centrifugal forces in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
f. If there is Spheroidality , curvature or angle, increase or reduce, as applicable, in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.

Note that here three tactical principles are presented:
PI.24, which recommends using a carrying handle to operate the plastic cup,
PI.21, which recommends minimizing exposure to risk, to which the plastic cup exposes the Customer,
PI.14, which recommends applying curved or angled shapes to the plastic cup.

The complete exercise for building a specific solution is shown in Point 11 of this document.
For this particular case, the applied solution to the plastic cup is to transform it by combining it with a cardboard sheet, which acts as a simple tool to facilitate the movement of the cup without the customer getting burned. The sheet should be prepared in advance, and the plastic cup should be modified to have an angled or conical shape that facilitates the attachment of the cardboard sheet.
It is worth noting that the application of PI.14 in this case is a challenging exercise in applying relational thinking. It also demonstrates the value of meeting the requirement outlined here to provide an 'integrated reading' of each recommended contradiction in Table V.

Next, Table VI is presented, which aims to propose alternative combinations of innovation parameters, based on up to 7 parameters that have been entered. This is done in order to minimize the uncertainties of an innovation challenge, where it may be difficult to determine the parameter combination that delivers the optimal solution to the challenge under evaluation. The Innovation Team will decide whether to consider them for evaluation. Best practice recommends reviewing one or two of the proposed combinations, whether from Table VI.A or Table VI.B.

The Aatrizinventor algorithm for accelerated solution approximation does not apply a formula that provides exact results. This is because the selection of innovation parameters to be evaluated depends on the evolutionary state of the innovation challenge under evaluation. Practice has shown that alternative solutions are needed to find the one that provides the greatest satisfaction. Initially, the algorithm operated with 4 undesirable effects and a specific need to satisfy, and often did not reach a satisfactory solution. By including more undesirable effects and incorporating all the needs to satisfy, sensitivity analysis quickly led to an optimal solution.
Undoubtedly, the experience of the Innovation Team in the specific domain where the innovation challenge occurs, along with knowledge of how variables change, will be essential for the proper formulation of the challenge and the interpretation of the solutions proposed by the algorithm.
Ultimately, the solution will be the result of an alliance between the Innovation Team and Nature's L.I. Extending, as proposed by Prigogine and Stengers in their book 'The New Alliance' in 1977, innovation in human development in the 21st century should be the result of an alliance between Humanity and divine Nature.

The Aatrizinventor algorithm is designed to simultaneously analyze up to 10 needs to satisfy and up to 7 undesirable effects, which implies evaluating a total of 350 combinations. This allows for providing a solution based on the information decided by the Innovation Team, along with a sensitivity analysis that prioritizes the 10 most promising solutions. This capability greatly facilitates obtaining a precise final solution. Below is the result obtained for the case of serving hot coffee in a plastic cup.

To compare the parameter combination of innovation being evaluated with the combinations proposed by the sensitivity analysis, Table VI can include three types messages, which are added to each matching combination, based on the criteria that is met:
(E) Combination of TRIZ innovation parameters evaluated in this Aatrizinventor Solution is prioritized here.
(U) Combination of TRIZ innovation parameters shows a match only in the evaluated undesirable effects.
Combination of TRIZ innovation parameters evaluated in this Aatrizinventor Solution is NOT prioritized here.

If the combination of parameters that you have selected does not satisfy you, it is recommended to select 2 or 3 of those prioritized in Table VI Sensitivity analysis. To evaluate any of the selected alternatives you must click Reset and re-enter the required information.

10.6 Table VI Sensitivity Analysis

Below is Table VII, which shows the essential contradictions obtained for each of the defined Needs to Satisfy, considering the same undesirable effects that have been evaluated, not including those considered for sensitivity analysis.
This table is based on the calculation of a global coverage (Cob.GL), which is determined by combining two values: the coverage from Table IV (Cob.NS) already explained, and a relative coverage (Cob. between CE) obtained in this Table VII by comparing the essential contradictions identified for the 10 parameters of Needs to satisfy.
This global coverage (GL) is based on expert weighting criteria to prioritize solutions for the various Needs to Satisfy. Experience with aatrizinventor indicates that the most effective solutions are those with higher global coverage, preferably exceeding 90%.
The Innovation Team may decide whether it is advisable to conduct a new evaluation with another Need to Satisfy, selected from the results provided in Table VII. This decision will be made primarily when the evaluated Need to Satisfy is not classified among the three highest positions in the Table. In this table, the position of the evaluated Need to Satisfy for the case of serving hot coffee in a plastic cup is highlighted:13. Stability.

Next, Table VIII is presented, which shows a prioritized analysis of the inventive principles included in TABLE II. Specific Contradiction Matrix. As an example, the inventive principles obtained from the contradictions formed by the parameters evaluated for the Plastic Cup Object are shown, resulting in the Recommended Solution presented in Table V. These parameters are:
(+) 1. Heaviness of moving object
(+) 23. Loss of substance
(+) 25. Loss of time
(-) 29. fulfillment of desired outcome
Par. NS: (+) 13. Stability
Inventive principles marked with *** are not included in the Recommended Solution (Table V). The first three marked ones are described alongside Table V to be considered in the evaluation. Sometimes, these make a specific and significant contribution to the solution. It is recommended to conduct an additional review, within the context determined by Table V, following the order of their position.

It's important to highlight that inventive principles can encompass various innovation concepts with different applications. Some open up a range of possibilities that demand our utmost relational thinking skills. From practical experience, the inventive principles with the most diverse options are as follows:

IP.3 Local Quality operates on a localized or micro level, requiring thorough analysis to decide the level at which it will be applied.

IP.13 Inverse or Indirect Action, which seems clear when it comes to changing a direct action between evaluated objects. In other cases, when an action oriented to the evaluated object is required: Turning it over, placing it upside down, changing its position or condition, it is not simple to identify the most advisable course of action.

IP.14, Sphericity - Curvature - Angle, which is one of the most unexpected inventive principles for me, considering all possible curved or angled forms of application, fixed or rotational. It demands rigorous relational thinking. It has created a new paradigm for me: In innovation, the shortest distance between two points is a curve.

IP.18, Vibrations/ Energy Variations, which, originating in engineering, prioritizes mechanical vibrations. In nature, this principle is expressed in a more general form, associated with energy variations that allow the achievement of an objective based on oscillations of an object or its function: An object moves back and forth to interact with a danger, a tree sways to resist the wind, the sea moves through waves to protect its diversity, the farmer plants in harvest cycles, man competes in laps in a race, etc.

IP.22, Turn Harm into Benefit, "make lemonade if you have lemons," is challenging in the sense of finding a positive action from a harmful effect. It works and is of minimal cost: the cargo ship that ran aground in the Suez Canal, mainly due to low tide, was freed by leveraging the rising tide, the man sinking in the snow due to the low area of his foot expands the interaction area by putting on snowshoes to walk, etc.

IP.26 Copy/ Replicate, which involves obtaining an improved object or copy from something as simple as adding a cardboard sheet to a plastic cup, replicating a caretaker in a field by creating a scarecrow, to replicating a man with a robot or doing the work of a data analyst with artificial intelligence software.
Inventive principle 26, along with 27 and 28, explains the emergence of artificial intelligence.>

IP.27, Short-Lived Cheap Objects, which aims to divide an object or function into multiple low-cost, short-lived components, properties, or characteristics, to facilitate the achievement of an objective at minimum cost or difficulty. Some examples include the separation of minerals into segments to obtain concentrations of various primary products, transient phenomena in physical-chemical processes to separate components, nanotechnology to manipulate matter on a nanoscale, the division of large volumes of information into bits for processing in computers, etc.

IP.28 Mechanical Substitution, which encompasses all forms of generating motion, from a tool to loosen a nut, sensory signals to activate movement, the use of energy fields to propel objects, integration of diverse fields to generate structured or synchronous movements, and finally, the use of energy fields to activate particles that generate movement, such as the magnetic levitation train. Using fields to activate particles to generate movement should be the challenge of the 21st century: traveling to space without the need for riding on a bomb!!

In Table IX, the detailed description of the contradictions selected by the algorithm to form the recommended solution is shown, identified in Table V. This table, included in the Aatrizinventor Innovation Report, is divided into 2 parts: IX.A, which displays the 5 contradictions composing the Base Solution, and IX.B corresponding to the 3 contradictions marking the Solution between Needs to Satisfy.
In the following section, Point 11 details these contradictions for the case Service of Hot Coffee in Plastic Cup and provides a recommendation on how to use them to construct a Specific Solution.

CONTRADICTIONS AND RECOMMENDED INVENTIVE PRINCIPLES FOR BUILDING A SPECIFIC SOLUTION

As an example of how to build a Specific Solution based on the selected Recommended Solution, the case of Improve hot coffee service in a plastic cup affected by burning the Customer's hand is developed below, which has been explained in detail in this Startup Manual

The Aatrizinventor algorithm provides a Recommended Solution that involves addressing a set of contradictions based on the inventive principles they consist of. Each contradiction should contribute a part of the specific solution, integrating its inventive principles coherently. All contradictions must contribute to a comprehensive and consistent solution that addresses the evaluation challenge.
To facilitate the analysis of these contradictions, the recommended inventive principles for each of them are presented below, divided into four groups.
The detailed contradictions shown below is available in Aatrizinventor Report Table IX. The specific analysis of these contradictions must be conducted by the Innovation Team.

GROUP 1: This corresponds to the first two contradictions in Table III belonging to the Base Solution, composed of the heaviest-weighted principles, typically of a strategic nature. These contradictions guide the solution's strategy. Strategic principles are more generic in character, so it may not yet be possible to project a solution, only general guidelines. The following groups will give more specific signals, which could require a new review of these principles, to consolidate the solution. The following list shows the inventive principles of Group 1.

ESSENTIAL CONTRADICTION
Contradiction order wt.1
Parameter to improve: (+) 23. Loss of substance
TO IMPROVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Loss of substance or relevant value, interacting with S2
Parameter to attenuate or preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
TO ATTENUATE OR PRESERVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Loss of time or causes a bottleneck interacting with S2
Inventive principles IP(s) : [15,18,35,10]
15. Dynamics, Str. IP (Pos.11):
a. Allow (or design) the characteristics of PLASTIC CUP*, external environment, or process to change to an optimal, or to find an optimal, operating condition.
b. Divide PLASTIC CUP* into parts that are capable of relative movement between each other.
c. If PLASTIC CUP* (or process) is rigid or inflexible, make it flexible or adaptive.
d. To enhance the dynamics of PLASTIC CUP* or the process, use feature(s) or object(s) available in the nearby environment.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security); Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations, Tac. IP (Pos.5):
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic). Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations (e.g., ultrasonic, and electromagnetic).
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its functions.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
10. Preliminary Action, Str. IP (Pos.2):
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance

COMPLEMENTARY CONTRADICTION 1
Contradiction order wt.2
Parameter to improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object
TO IMPROVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Heaviness, value, cost, or restriction, whether physical or figurative interacting with S2
Parameter to attenuate or preserve: (-) 29. Fulfillment of desired outcome
TO ATTENUATE OR PRESERVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has Less Achievement of desired outcome interacting with S2
Inventive principles IP(s) : [28,35,26,18]
28. Mechanics Substitution, Str. IP (Pos.3):
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with field-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
26. Copying/ Replicating, Str. IP (Pos.13):
a. Instead of using PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its unavailable, expensive, fragile parts or properties, use simpler and inexpensive copies or replicates to perform the desired function and, if possible, do so with improved characteristics and properties, while disregarding the harmful, undesirable, or unnecessary ones.
b. Imitate or replicate PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its parts or properties, leveraging the relevant available environment.
c. If simple copies, or replicates are already being used, apply copies, or replicates of a higher level or technical complexity.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations, Tac. IP (Pos.5):
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic). Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations (e.g., ultrasonic, and electromagnetic).
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its functions.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)

STARTING A SOLUTION
The application of these two contradictions requires the Innovation Team to select the applicable innovation concepts for the evaluated case. Below the analysis that has already been conducted is shown.

Solution to improve more losses due to Customer rejection (Par.23) and Attenuate more time loss in sales due to Customer burns (Par.25)
Par.[23,25]: PI.[15,18,35,10]
PI.15, Strategic: Change the dynamic of movement between the Plastic Cup* and the Customer.
PI.18, Tactical: Plastic Cup* should have a cyclic movement between the resting point and the Customer.
PI.35, Strategic: Transform the physical state of Plastic Cup*, making it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.10, Strategic: Strategic: The change of Plastic Cup* should be performed before it becomes necessary for the Customers.
Comment: The described contradiction shows how to improve the economic strategy of the hot coffee sales business: Reduce sales losses and improve their turnover.

Solution to Improve more Heaviness of Plastic Cup movement due to hot Coffee (Par.1) and Attenuate less achievement of business sales target (Par.29).
Par.[1,29]: PI.[28,35,26,18]:
PI.28, Strategic: Mechanism that allows the Customer to move the Plastic Cup* should be improved to one that is safer. This principle considers all possible ways to generate movement, so each time it is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.26, Strategic: A copy or replica of the current Plastic Cup should be generated to enhance the functionality of a Plastic Cup* for serving hot coffee. Whenever this principle is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.
PI.18, Tactical: Plastic Cup* should have a cyclic movement between the point of delivery or rest and the Customer.

GROUP 2: These correspond to the following three contradictions from Table V, also belonging to the Base Solution. In these contradictions, more tactical and operational inventive principles appear, allowing for a better focus on the solution. The tactical and operational concepts added by this group of inventive principles should be consistent with the strategic focus deduced from Group 1.

COMPLEMENTARY CONTRADICTION 2
Contradiction order wt.3
Parameter to improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object
TO IMPROVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Heaviness, value, cost, or restriction, whether physical or figurative interacting with S2
Parameter to attenuate or preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
TO ATTENUATE OR PRESERVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Loss of time or causes a bottleneck interacting with S2
Inventive principles IP(s) : [10,35,20,28]
10. Preliminary Action, Str. IP (Pos.2):
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
20. Continuity of Useful Action, Oper. IP (Pos.15):
a. Make sure work is executed on continuously with PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Make all parts of PLASTIC CUP* work at full load, all the time.
c. Eliminate all idle or intermittent actions or work of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
28. Mechanics Substitution, Str. IP (Pos.3):
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with field-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes

COMPLEMENTARY CONTRADICTION 3
Contradiction order wt.6
Parameter to improve: (-) 29. Fulfillment of desired outcome
TO IMPROVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has Less Achievement of desired outcome interacting with S2
Parameter to attenuate or preserve: (+) 25. Loss of Time
TO ATTENUATE OR PRESERVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Loss of time or causes a bottleneck interacting with S2
Inventive principles IP(s) : [32,26,28,18]
32. Perception/ Appearance/ Color Changes, Str. IP (Pos.6):
a. Change how is perceived, the appearance or shape of PLASTIC CUP* in relation to the object (S2) with which it interacts.
b. Change the color, or appearance, of PLASTIC CUP* or its external environment.
c. Change the transparency of PLASTIC CUP* or its external environment.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
26. Copying/ Replicating, Str. IP (Pos.13):
a. Instead of using PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its unavailable, expensive, fragile parts or properties, use simpler and inexpensive copies or replicates to perform the desired function and, if possible, do so with improved characteristics and properties, while disregarding the harmful, undesirable, or unnecessary ones.
b. Imitate or replicate PLASTIC CUP*, or any of its parts or properties, leveraging the relevant available environment.
c. If simple copies, or replicates are already being used, apply copies, or replicates of a higher level or technical complexity.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
28. Mechanics Substitution, Str. IP (Pos.3):
a. Replace a direct or manual action in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with a mechanical action or a tool.
b. Replace a mechanical means in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, with sensory (optical, acoustic, vibration, taste, smell, feelings or other sensory fields) means.
c. Use mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic, chemical, biological, psychological or other fields to improve action of PLASTIC CUP*.
d. Change from static fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* to moving fields, from unstructured fields to those with structure, or vice versa.
e. Use fields in conjunction with field-activated parts, components, or particles (e.g., magnetic field and ferromagnetic particles) in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
18. Mechanical Vibrations/ Energy Variations, Tac. IP (Pos.5):
a. Move PLASTIC CUP* by cycles with energies that activate it
b. Cause PLASTIC CUP* to oscillate or vibrate. Increase its frequency (even up to the ultrasonic). Use the resonant frequency of PLASTIC CUP*. If necessary, decrease frequency.
c. Use vibration-generating fields in, or for, PLASTIC CUP* instead of mechanical vibration generators. Combine sources of oscillations (e.g., ultrasonic, and electromagnetic).
d. Apply alternation of PLASTIC CUP* or its functions.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)

COMPLEMENTARY CONTRADICTION 4
Contradiction order wt.10
Parameter to improve: (+) 1. Heaviness of moving object
TO IMPROVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Heaviness, value, cost, or restriction, whether physical or figurative interacting with S2
Parameter to attenuate or preserve: (+) 23. Loss of substance
TO ATTENUATE OR PRESERVE (UDE): PLASTIC CUP has More Loss of substance or relevant value, interacting with S2
Inventive principles IP(s) : [5,35,3,31]
5. Merging/ Separating, Str. IP (Pos.9):
a. Bring PLASTIC CUP* closer or merge with other objects with similar or identical operations or functions.
b. Bring PLASTIC CUP* closer or merge with other objects with similar operations or functions so that they can act together at the same time.
c. If there are objects fused to PLASTIC CUP*, and if necessary, apply a separation action.
d. If objects are merged, and if necessary, apply a separation action.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Integration in supersystem
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
3. Local quality, Str. IP (Pos.16):
a. Improve quality in a localized way, for parts, components, or conditions of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Change the structure, action, or procedure of PLASTIC CUP* from uniform to non-uniform, or vice versa.
c. Change the external environment (or external influence) of PLASTIC CUP* from uniform to non-uniform, or vice versa.
d. Make each part of PLASTIC CUP* function in the conditions that are most suitable for its operation.
e. Make each part of PLASTIC CUP* fulfill a different and useful function.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security); Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
31. Using/ Removing Unused Parts, Oper. IP (Pos.17):
a. Take advantage of unused parts of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Remove or do not use unnecessary parts of PLASTIC CUP*.
(e.g., make an object porous or add porous elements – inserts, coatings, etc. If an object is already porous, use the pores to introduce a useful substance or function).
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged.

CLARIFYING A SOLUTION
The 3 contradictions described above allow us to determine specific aspects of the solution, mainly with tactical and operational inventive principles.

Solution to improve more heaviness of Plastic Cup movement due to hot coffee (Par.1) and attenuate more time loss in sales due to Customer Burns (Par.25)
Par.[+1,+25]: PI.[10,35,20,18]
PI.10, Strategic: The change of Plastic Cup* should be performed before it becomes necessary for the Customer.
PI.35, Strategic: Transform the physical state of Plastic Cup*, making it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.20, Tactical: All inactive or intermittent actions or operations of Plastic Cup* with Customer should be eliminated.
PI.28, Strategic: Mechanism that allows the Customer to move the Plastic Cup* should be improved to one that is safer. This principle considers all possible ways to generate movement, so each time it is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.

Solution to Improve the low achievement of business sales target (Par.29) and Attenuate time loss in sales due to Customer burns (Par.25).
Par.[-29,+25]: PI.[32,26,28,18]
PI.32, tactical: The way Plastic Cup* is perceived by the Customer should be changed. Due to the generic nature of this principle, every time it is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.
PI.26, Strategic: A copy or replica of the current Plastic Cup should be generated to enhance the functionality of a Plastic Cup* for serving hot coffee. Whenever this principle is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.
PI.28, Strategic: Mechanism that allows the Customer to move the Plastic Cup* should be improved to one that is safer. This principle considers all possible ways to generate movement, so each time it is applied, further contradictions should be considered to specify the most suitable solution.
PI.18, Tactical: Plastic Cup* should have a cyclic movement between the point of delivery or rest and the Customer.

Solution to improve the heaviness of Plastic Cup movement due to hot coffee (Par.1) and Attenuate sales losses due to Customer rejection (Par.23).
Par.[+1,+23]: PI.[5,35,3,31]
PI.5, Operational: Plastic Cup* should be joined or fused with another object with similar or compatible functions to act together at the same time to contain the heat that burns the Customer's hand.
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.3, Strategic: Each part of Plastic Cup* should serve a different and useful function, changing it from uniform to no-uniform.
PI.31, Operational: Unused parts of Plastic Cup* should be utilized, in this case, its outer part.

GROUP 3: It corresponds to the first three contradictions between Needs to Satisfy that are shown in Table IV, which contain inventive principles that do not participate in Table II, where the base solution already described is defined. The analysis of this group of inventive principles must be consistent with the solution approach deduced from groups 1 and 2 already seen. These contradictions present inventive principles of various kinds, which allow the solution to be complemented. The objective of including these contradictions is also to ensure that the improvement of the evaluated need to satisfy does not worsen the other needs to satisfy. The List of contradictions of Group 3 shown below.

CONTRADICTION BETWEEN NEEDS TO SATISFY N° 1
Parameter to improve 13. Stability
IMPROVE > PLASTIC CUP has More Desired stability to interact with S2
Parameter to preserve 38. Extent of automation/ autonomy
PRESERVE > PLASTIC CUP has more desirable effect for parameter 38. Extent of automation/ autonomy
Inventive principles IP(s) : [1,8,35,0]
1. Segmenting/ Integrating, Str. IP (Pos.12):
a. Divide PLASTIC CUP* into existing and/or new parts, shapes, phases, states, or conditions.
b. Integrate different parts, shapes, phases, states, or existing or new conditions of a PLASTIC CUP* into a single entity..
c. Make PLASTIC CUP* easy to disassemble or assemble.
d. Increase or reduce the degree of fragmentation or segmentation of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space / Separation in subsystem
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security); Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
8. Anti-weight/ Compensation, Tac. IP (Pos.):
a. To compensate for the heaviness/lightness or incidence of PLASTIC CUP*, merge it with other objects or independent own parts that provide an effect to improve the current situation.
b. To compensate for the heaviness/lightness or incidence of PLASTIC CUP*, make it interact with the environment.
For example, compensate for the heaviness of PLASTIC CUP* subject to a gravitational field, or exposed to a magnetic field, or subject to an economic value or price, or subject to a chemical bond, or subject to intellectual rigidity, a paradigm, or prejudices.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)


CONTRADICTION BETWEEN NEEDS TO SATISFY N° 2
Parameter to improve 13. Stability
IMPROVE: PLASTIC CUP has More Desired stability to interact with S2
Parameter to preserve 35. Adaptability or versatility
PRESERVE: PLASTIC CUP has more desirable effect for parameter 35. Adaptability or versatility
Inventive principles IP(s) : [35,30,34,2]
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
30. Simple Shapes/ Ways to Interact, Tac. IP (Pos.7):
a. Use flexible rods and ropes, or another option with similar one-dimensional functionality, or shells and thin films, or another option with similar two-dimensional functionality, for PLASTIC CUP*, instead of complex three-dimensional structures, in type and number of components and shapes.
b. Separate/isolate PLASTIC CUP* from the external environment with simple shapes, using flexible rods and ropes, or another option with similar one-dimensional functionality, or shells and thin films, or another option with similar two-dimensional functionality.
c. Instead of using complex forms or methods with PLASTIC CUP* to interact with S2 Object, one should use simpler ways or methods, employing flexible objects or means, either physical or conceptual, operating predominantly in one or two dimensions, with other dimensions to the minimum. This is in order to reduce the number of resources and actions necessary to achieve the desired objective.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
34. Discarding and Recovering, Tac. IP (Pos.):
a. Make portions of PLASTIC CUP* , which have fulfilled their functions or are unnecessary, go away (discard by absorption, dissolving, evaporating, etc.).
b. Conversely, restore consumable parts of PLASTIC CUP* directly in operation.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving if a solution has not yet emerged
2. Taking Out/ Adding, Str. IP (Pos.4):
a. Separate an interfering part or a property from PLASTIC CUP*, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Add new parts or properties to PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes

CONTRADICTION BETWEEN NEEDS TO SATISFY N° 3
Parameter to improve 13. Stability
IMPROVE: PLASTIC CUP has More Desired stability to interact with S2
Parameter to preserve 34. Ease of change, repair or maintain
PRESERVE: PLASTIC CUP has more desirable effect for parameter 34. Ease of change, repair or maintain
Inventive principles IP(s) : [2,35,10,16]
2. Taking Out/ Adding, Str. IP (Pos.4):
a. Separate an interfering part or a property from PLASTIC CUP*, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of PLASTIC CUP*.
b. Add new parts or properties to PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in space
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes
35. Transformation/ Parameter Changes, Str. IP (Pos.1):
a. Change PLASTIC CUP*'s physical or chemical state (e.g., in shape, in composition, to a gas, liquid, solid or plasma).
b. Change the composition or condition of PLASTIC CUP* by adding or removing components.
c. Change the concentration or consistency; change the degree of flexibility; change the temperature or the level of internal activity of PLASTIC CUP*.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation by condition / Separation alternative
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving 7 quality factors (Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability, Human Factors, Safety, Security)
10. Preliminary Action, Str. IP (Pos.2):
a. Perform the required change in, or for, PLASTIC CUP*, before it is needed (either fully or partially).
b. Pre-arrange PLASTIC CUP* and other objects, if necessary, in such a way that they can come into action from the most convenient place and without losing time for their delivery.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving attributes; Improving performance
16. Partial or Excessive Actions, Oper. IP (Pos.):
a. If the goal of PLASTIC CUP* is hard to achieve fully, using a given solution’s method; then the problem may be considerably easier to solve, using “slightly less” or “slightly more” of the same method.
Separation principle for PLASTIC CUP* : Separation in time
Solution strategy for PLASTIC CUP* : Improving performance

COMPLEMENTING A SOLUTION
The 3 contradictions described above allow us to determine another specific aspects of the solution, to complement the solution reached.

Solution to Improve more Stability of hot coffee service in Plastic Cup (Par.13) and Preserve more extent of automation/autonomy of hot coffee service in Plastic Cup (Par.38).
Par.[+13,+38]: PI.[1,8,35,0]
PI.1, Strategic: Plastic Cup* must be divided into existing and new parts, each with different functions.
PI.8, Tactical: Compensate for the heaviness of Plastic Cup* due to hot coffee by combining it with another object that provides an effect to improve the current situation.

PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
Solution to Improve the Stability of hot coffee service in Plastic Cup (Par.13) and Preserve the adaptability or versatility of hot coffee Service in Plastic Cup (Par.35).
Par.[+13,+35]: PI.[35,30,34,2]
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.30, Tactical: Separate/isolate Plastic Cup* from the external environment, using thin flexible covers films curved. This inventive principle allows determining in this particular case the specific application of strategic inventive principles 28 and 26: Improve the mechanics of movement using a tool or mechanism such as a flexible sheet attached to the Plastic Cup (IP.28) and make a replica of the Cup Plastic, which is something as simple as a Plastic Cup with a flexible sheet attached (IP.26).
PI.34, Tactical: Remove parts of Plastic Cup* that have fulfilled their functions or are unnecessary, or restore consumable parts of Plastic Cup* directly into operation.
PI.2, Strategic: Add new parts to Plastic Cup* to interact with the Customer.

Solution to Improve the Stability of hot coffee Service in Plastic Cup (Par.13) and Preserve the ease of Change, Repair, or Maintenance the hot Coffee service in Plastic Cup (Par.34).
Par.[+13,+34]: PI.[2,35,10,16]
PI.2, Strategic: Add new parts to Plastic Cup* to interact with the Customer.
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.10, Strategic: The change of Plastic Cup* should be performed before it becomes necessary for the Customer.

PI.16, operational: Adjust a given solution method slightly more or less until the solution is optimal.

Group 4: It corresponds to the up to three contradictions selected by the Innovation Team, which are deduced from the inventive principles that do not participate in the Recommended Solution, identified in Table VIII and listed Table V, see item 10.5. The contradictions in which the aforementioned innovation parameters participate are not described in the Aatrizinventor Report, then they must be seen in the link 'Contradiction by Parameters' in the Startup Manual. The application of these contradictions in the case of serving hot coffee in a Plastic Cup is detailed below.

Solution to Improve more sales losses of hot coffee in Plastic Cup (Par.23) and Attenuate less achievement of the hot coffee sales target in Plastic Cup (Par.29).
Par.[+23,-29]: PI.[35,10,24,31]
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.10, Strategic: The change of Plastic Cup* should be performed before it becomes necessary for the Customer.
PI.24, Tactical: For Plastic Cup*, use a carrying article or an intermediate process.
PI.31, Operational: Unused parts of Plastic Cup* should be utilized, in this case, its outer part.

Solution to Improve more Stability of hot coffee service in Plastic Cup (Par.13) and Preserve more Heaviness of Plastic Cup movement due to hot Coffee (Par.35).
Par.[+13,+1]: PI.[21,35,2,39]:
PI.21, Tactical: Ensure that with Plastic Cup*, the process or certain stages are conducted at high speed or for a minimum exposure to risk.
PI.35, Strategic: Physical state of Plastic Cup* should be transformed to make it more flexible for interaction with the Customer.
PI.2, Strategic: Add new parts to Plastic Cup* to interact with the Customer.
PI.39, Operational: Add neutral or convenient parts, or inert or active additives to Plastic Cup* or its environment.

Contradiction Solution to Improve more sales losses of hot coffee in PLASTIC CUP* (Par.23) and Preserve more stability of hot coffee service in PLASTIC CUP* (Par.13).
Par.[+23,+13]: PI.[2,14,30,40]
PI.2, Strategic: Add new parts to Plastic Cup* to interact with the Customer.
PI.14, tactical: For interaction between Plastic Cup* and Object S2, instead of using straight-line pieces, surfaces, or shapes, use curved or angled shapes: an angled Plastic Cup*, with varying diameter with height, to facilitate the attachment of a thin, flexible sheet.
PI.30, tactical: Separate/isolate Plastic Cup* from the external environment, using thin flexible covers films curved.
PI.40, operational: Change Plastic Cup* from a uniform material, state, or condition to a composite one.

The contradictions and their inventive principles shown here demonstrate the multivariable nature of innovation solutions, which the Aatrizinventor algorithm develops rapidly, leaving no loose ends. And if something goes wrong, you can fix it with the same algorithm.
The comprehensive solution obtained for the case of serving hot coffee in a plastic cup has required many concepts to take shape. To highlight the result of the analysis, a picture is worth a thousand words.

The contradictions and their inventive principles presented here describe a systematic, fast, and effective way to find innovative solutions. To innovate, "don't wait for the lightbulb to turn on," that method is slow and costly. The Nature's Language of Innovation can address challenges in any area of human development, regardless of complexity, and provides solutions with minimal implementation costs and a maximum benefit over costs ratio.