a. The thermal state of OBJECT S1, or the internal level of activity, which influences object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The attitude or behavior of OBJECT S1, person or object, which reflects the internal emotional or reactive level, which influences object S2 which it interacts.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Temperature/ Level of internal activity:
Question 17.1: Is there evidence in the current situation of an excessive or insufficient thermal temperature condition of OBJECT S1 that impacts its interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?
Question 17.2: Is there evidence in the current situation of an excessive or insufficient internal activity level of OBJECT S1 that impacts its interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?
Question 17.3: Is there evidence in the current situation of an excessive or insufficient internal human condition of motivation, emotion, excitement, or other, of OBJECT S1 that conditions the interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?

Application Examples:
Temperature of the Plastic Cup OBJECT S1 in motion:
(+) Temperature due to the hot coffee that burns the hand of OBJECT S2: Client, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Internal Activity Level of the Nuclear Reactor stationary OBJECT S1:
(+) Radiation that it emits damaging OBJECT S2: Operator, affecting the achievement of the desired objective when both objects interact.

Internal Activity Level of stationary OBJECT S1 Resonant Object:
(+) Resonance it transmits affecting OBJECT S2: Equipment sensitive to resonance, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Temperature/Internal Activity of moving OBJECT S1 Soccer Player:
(-) Motivation to win the game required to face OBJECT S2: Superior rival team, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. Any type of field emission intensity, physical or figurative, of OBJECT S1, relevant to perform a function with object S2 with which it interacts.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Emission intensity:
Question 18.1: In the current situation, is there evidence of excessive or insufficient emission of a commonly low-energy field generated by OBJECT S1, which manifests its state or condition and is perceived by OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?
Question 18.2: In the current situation, is there evidence of excessive or insufficient human expression of motivation, emotion, excitement, or other aspects of OBJECT S1 that are externalized and condition the interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?

Application Examples:
Emission Intensity of stationary OBJECT S1 Candle:
(-) Illumination perceived by OBJECT S2: Book reader, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Emission Intensity of stationary OBJECT S1 Nuclear Material:
(+) Radioactive emission due to leakage perceived by OBJECT S2: Operator, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Emission Intensity of moving OBJECT S1 Daughter/Son:
(+) Crying as an expression of hunger received by OBJECT S2: Mother, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The power - rate of energy use per unit of time - of OBJECT S1 that interacts with object S2.
b. The work (force x displacement) divided per unit of time, with which a task is performed by OBJECT S1 when it interacts with object S2.
c. In classical physics, power is the product of force x velocity or energy divided by time. In other fields use the corresponding power conversion.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Power (Energy per unit of time):
Question 21.1: In the current situation, is there evidence of excessive or insufficient use of power or energy per unit of time sustained throughout the space and time of OBJECT S1's evaluation, interacting with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?

Application Examples:
Power of stationary OBJECT S1 Combustion Engine:
(-) Combustion power applied to OBJECT S2: Automobile containing it, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Power of stationary OBJECT S1 Direct Current Rectifier:
(-) Power for electrolysis applied to OBJECT S2: Copper Anode-Cathode Configuration, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Power of moving OBJECT S1 Weightlifter:
(-) Lifting power applied to OBJECT S2: Sports weights, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The use of energy that does not contribute to the task or action performed by OBJECT S1 when it interacts with object S2.
b. The energy loss of the inefficient activities of OBJECT S1 when it interacts with object S2.
c. Energy losses in parts and components of OBJECT S1 when it interacts with object S2.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Loss of Energy:
Question 22.1: In the current situation, is there evidence or a perception of the use of energy that does not contribute to the task or action carried out by OBJECT S1 to interact with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?

Application Examples:
Energy Loss of stationary OBJECT S1 Heat Generator Equipment:
(+) Energy loss due to radiation caused by poor OBJECT S2: Insulation system, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Energy Loss of moving OBJECT S1 Moving Equipment:
(+) Energy loss due to energy consumption during idle time caused by OBJECT S2: Intermittent operation process, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.
Energy Loss of moving OBJECT S1 Production or Service Process:
(+) Energy loss due to excessive energy consumption that does not contribute to achieving OBJECT S2 final Product or Service, whether measured or perceived, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The partial or total loss, permanent or temporary, of some substances of OBJECT S1, relevant to interact with OBJECT S2.
b. Substance refers to any part, component, or characteristic of OBJECT S1, the loss of which affects the achievement of the desired goal when interacting with OBJECT S2. For example, loss of material, parts, components, money, or value and human qualities.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Loss of substance:
Question 23.1: Is there currently evidence of partial or total, permanent or temporary loss of certain materials, physical or economic substances, parts, or subsystems relevant to the action of OBJECT S1, which alters the interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact?

Application Examples:
Substance Loss of stationary OBJECT S1 Plant Cell:
(+) Loss of components due to lack of water (H2O), which alters the productivity of the catalysis performed by the cell with light+nCO2(carbon dioxide) +nH2O(water), producing nHCHO(energy) + nO2(emission), operating with OBJECT S2: The environment, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Substance Loss of moving OBJECT S1 Plastic Cup:
(+) Loss of hot coffee sales caused by burning OBJECT S2: Customer's hand, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Substance Loss of moving OBJECT S1 Immigrant:
(-) Loss of original culture that alters the interaction with OBJECT S2: The local community receiving them, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The partial or total, permanent or temporary loss of data or access to data in or by OBJECT S1 when sending or receiving it from object S2.
b. Not sharing or ignorance of information between OBJECT S1 and object S2, relevant to perform a common function.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Loss of Information:
Question 24.1: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 loses or lacks relevant information for the interaction with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Loss of information of moving object S1 Airplane:
(+) Loss of information for takeoff in fog that affects the interaction with OBJECT S2: Runway, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Loss of information of moving object S1 Cook:
(+) Loss of temperature information of OBJECT S2: Baking dish in the oven, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Loss of information of stationary object S1 Boiler Operator:
(+) Loss of water level information of OBJECT S2: Steam boiler, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The excessive duration of the function carried out jointly by OBJECT S1 with object S2, due to the execution of activities that do not contribute to the desired result.
b. The difference between the desired and the actual duration, due to activities that do not contribute to the function performed by OBJECT S1 when it interacts with object S2.
c. The perception that OBJECT S1 wastes time in the required interaction with Object S2.
d. The differential execution time of an activity that is a 'bottleneck' in an activity or process when it interacts with object S2.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Loss of Time:
Question 25.1: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 loses time due to the excessive duration of activities that do not contribute to the result of the function performed when interacting with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?
Question 25.2: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 performs bottleneck activities in the process, then loses time due to the excessive duration of activities that delay the result of the function performed when interacting with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Time loss of moving OBJECT S1 Shift Operator:
(+) Time loss due to operator shift change interacting with OBJECT S2: Continuous production process, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Time loss of stationary OBJECT S1 Machine for manufacturing bolts:
(+) Time loss due to being a bottleneck when interacting with OBJECT S2: Machine for manufacturing bolted boxes, affecting the achievement of the desired goal.

Time loss of moving OBJECT S1 Traveling Suitcase:
(+) Time loss due to rest breaks by OBJECT S2: Traveling person, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The number or quantity of materials, substances, products, parts, pieces, human or natural activities, states, or conditions with similar unitary characteristics or properties - based on a predefined capacity - that is produced, handled, or modified, totally or partially, within a specified time frame or other parameter by OBJECT S1 to perform a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts.

b. The capacity achieved by OBJECT S1 when performing a common function with OBJECT S2.
Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Quantity of substance/ Capacity gains:
Question 26.1: In the current situation, is there evidence that OBJECT S1 performs actions in cycles to produce, handle, or modify materials, substances, products, parts, pieces, human or natural activities, states, or conditions with predefined characteristics or standards, and the quantity is a relative measure of the capacity to carry out these actions when interacting with OBJECT S2, affecting the achievement of the desired goal? Note: Once a process cycle is completed, the quantities become volumes for storage, transportation, etc.

Application Examples:
Quantity of substance/ Capacity gain of stationary OBJECT S1 Computers Factory:
(-) Number of computers manufactured than programmed by OBJECT S2: Employees to manufacture computers, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

(-) Quantity of substance / Capacity gain of stationary OBJECT S1 Peach Orchard: (-) Quantity of harvested peaches that does not meet the expected amount for OBJECT S2: Harvesters, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

(+) Quantity of substance/ Capacity gain of moving OBJECT S1 Fleet of Seafood Fishing:
(+) Quantity of caught fish exceeds the authorized limit due to OBJECT S2: Fishing net layout, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Quantity of substance/ Capacity gain of moving OBJECT S1 Social Welfare
Service: (-) Quantity of assistance given that does not meet the expected amount for OBJECT S2: Social workers, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The proximity of the measured value to the real value of a property or variable of OBJECT S1, relevant to performing a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts.
b. Reducing measurement error modifies the accuracy of the measurement.
Note: Do not confuse accuracy with precision: precision is the degree of compliance with specifications or the desired result, i.e., the proximity of the measured value, more or less exact, to a reference value. For this undesirable effect of precision, apply parameter 29.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Measurement accuracy:
Question 28.1: In the current situation, is there evidence that object S1 has a measurement of materials, products, parts, human or natural activities with measurable characteristics using a specific physical or figurative pattern, and that the proximity of the measured value to the real value of a property or variable related to OBJECT S1 is relevant to perform a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Measurement accuracy of moving object S1 Quality Inspector:
(+) Measured weight compared to the actual weight due to an error of object S2: inferior quality meter, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact

Measurement accuracy of moving object S1 Operator of molten parts furnace:
(-) Perceived temperature compared to the actual temperature due to an error of object S2: Temperature estimation based on color applied by the operator's eye, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Measurement accuracy of stationary object S1 Boiler water level meter:
(+) Water level compared to the actual level due to an error of object S2: Snagged float cable, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The degree of compliance or measurement precision of the real characteristics - measured or counted - or the result of a product or service obtained, in relation to the specified or required reference characteristics to be met by OBJECT S1 in a certain, commonly repetitive cycle when performing a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Fulfillment of desired outcome:
Question 29.1: In the current situation, is there evidence that object S1 has a measurement of results using a specific physical or figurative pattern, and the proximity of the measured value to the reference value allows for quantifying the effectiveness of a function related to OBJECT S2 with which it interacts, that, being excessive or insufficient, is affecting the fulfillment of the desired objective?

Application Examples:
Achievement of Desired Outcome by Moving Object S1 Automobile Manufacturing System:
(-) Monthly production target achievement by Object S2: Manufactured automobiles, affecting the fulfillment of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Achievement of Desired Outcome by Moving Object S1 Toy Designer:
(-) Degree of compliance with desired toys by Object S2: Children, affecting the fulfillment of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Achievement of Desired Outcome by stationary Object S1 Public Health System:
(-) Percentage of compliance with requested healthcare services by Object S2: The Protected Population, affecting the fulfillment of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. OBJETO S1 is affected by harmful factors, caused or derived from its interaction with Object S2.
b. These harmful effects are caused by or due to Object S2 as part of its operation.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Object-affected harmful factors:
Question 30.1: In the current situation, is there evidence that Object S1 is affected in its physical condition, operational state, or functionality reduced due to the interaction with Object S2, limiting or preventing the performance of a function between them, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Moving Object S1 Customer of hot coffee service:
(+) Affected by burning their hand when taking Object S2: Plastic cup with hot coffee, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Vehicle on the road:
(+) stopped by obstruction of movement by Object S2: Very heavy rock, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Lock pin:
(+) damaged by wear when rubbing against Object S2: Male-female parts, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. OBJECT S1 directly or indirectly generates harmful factors that affect object S2 with which it interacts.
b. These harmful effects are caused by OBJECT S1 as part of its operation.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Object-generated harmful factors:
Question 31.1: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 generates harmful factors that affect the physical condition, operational state, or functionality of OBJECT S2 with which it interacts, limiting or preventing the performance of a function between them, thereby affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Moving Object S1 Plastic cup with hot coffee generates harmful factors:
(+) burning the hand of OBJECT S2: Coffee service customer, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when Stationary Object S1 Steam Boiler: (+) Damage caused by superheated steam leak that burns to OBJECT S2: Boiler operator, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

Nature's L.I. identifies two conditions of adaptability or versatility for OBJECT S1, one as an undesirable effect and the other as a need to be satisfied. The first condition identified is described below.
Undesirable Effect:
a. The extent to which OBJECT S1 is affected by the variability of changes in OBJECT S2 with which it interacts, thereby preventing the achievement of the desired goal.

Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Adaptability or Versatility:
Question 35.1: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 is affected in its operation or functionality due to the variability in the behavior of OBJECT S2 with which it interacts, limiting or preventing the performance of a function between them, thereby affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Moving OBJECT S1 Teacher:
(-) Adaptability to variability in classroom behavior of OBJECT S2: Disorderly Students, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Stationary OBJECT S1 Bolt manufacturer:
(-) Adaptability to variability in quality of OBJECT S2: Raw material for bolts, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving OBJECT S1 Chimpanzee:
(-) Adaptability to variability in the location of OBJECT S2: Underground Termite Nest for feeding, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The number and diversity of elements and/or actions, and the interrelationships between them, of OBJECT S1, relevant to perform a function with object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The difficulty to dominate or control OBJECT S1, relevant to perform a function with object S2 with which it interacts.
Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Complexity of device/ action:
Question 36.1: Is there current evidence that OBJECT S1 is affected in its operation or functionality due to the quantity of elements or actions required for interaction with OBJECT S2, limiting or preventing the fulfillment of a function between both, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Moving OBJECT S1 Deaf Person:
(+) Affected by the complexity of communication due to the quantity of signs from OBJECT S2, the Sign Language Emitter, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Control Room Operator:
(+) affected by the quantity of variables to monitor from OBJECT S2: Analog control system, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Warehouse Auditor:
(+) affected by the diversity of materials and equipment to audit in OBJECT S2: Storage warehouse, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

a. The existing difficulty of OBJECT S1 to detect fields, properties or characteristics, shared or exclusive of object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The measurement or monitoring system of OBJECT S1 over S2 is complex, expensive and requires a lot of time and work to be used.
c. The measurement or monitoring system of OBJECT S1 on object S2 creates complex relationships between its components, or its components interfere with each other.
Identification of undesirable effects on OBJECT S1 due to Difficulty of detecting and measuring:
Question 37.1: Is there currently evidence that OBJECT S1 is affected in its operation or functionality due to difficulties in detecting and measuring the required states or conditions for interacting with OBJECT S2, limiting or preventing the performance of a function between both, affecting the achievement of the desired goal?

Application Examples:
Stationary Object S1 Sea Squirt's Larva Clinging headfirst to the Rock:
(+) Affected by difficulty in detecting food from OBJECT S2: Surrounding Seawater, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Wooden Toy Designer:
(+) Affected by difficulty in detecting the desired toy by OBJECT S2: Children in a digital world, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Moving Object S1 Car Driver:
(+) Affected by the difficulty of detecting the road due to OBJECT S2: Thick fog, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact. Moving Object S1 Facial Recognition Detector by Visual inspection: (+) Affected by the difficulty of effectively detecting people due to OBJECT S2: People of multidimensional factions, affecting the achievement of the desired goal when both objects interact.

Back to List

Below is the description of innovation parameters that can be associated with needs to be met, along with examples of application. They are organized according to their participation in the S-curve of innovation-evolution as indicated in Topic 2 of the Fundamentals of Inventive Aatrizinventor. The original TRIZ numbering is retained, now with a universal description.

a. The operational simplicity of OBJECT S1 to perform a common function with OBJECT S2.
OBJECT S1 is not easy to operate, especially if it has inadequate part division, if it operates in a very demanding and direct manner, if it has unnecessary or missing parts, if it operates at different energy potential levels, or if it is operated manually or with basic tools.

>Selection of the Need to Satisfy Ease of Operation:
Ease of operation occupies the first (1/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of an Object S1, whether moving or stationary, under evaluation, in a primary state of innovation-evolution. The goal is to improve the ease of operation of Object S1 to ensure an initial foundation of simple operation of the function or process it engages in, to achieve the desired goal.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Ease of Operation' for Object S1, whether moving or stationary, is the best decision or if there is another subsequent need to address that better represents the current situation to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The ease to change the quality aspects of OBJECT S1, moving or stationary, such as convenience, comfort, simplicity, and the required action time or continuity to make the desired goal viable, in advance and/or during the performance of the common function with OBJECT S2.
b. The ease to repair faults, breakages, or defects of OBJECT S1, relevant for it to perform a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts.
c. The ease to maintain OBJECT S1 in operation, avoiding faults or undesirable effects, relevant for performing a function with OBJECT S2 with which it interacts.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Ease to Change, Repair, or Maintain:
The ease of change, repair, or maintain occupies the second (2/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary OBJECT S1 under evaluation. The OBJECT S1 is in an enhanced basic state of innovation-evolution that has already achieved ease of operation. Now, the focus is on the ease to change, repair, or maintain to ensure the continuity of the function or process in which it participates, to improve the fulfillment of the desired goal.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovator's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis for various needs to satisfy, allowing validation of whether selecting 'Ease to Change, Repair, or Maintain' for OBJECT S1, whether moving or stationary, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The ease with which OBJECT S1 meets the specification, requirement, manipulation, action, construction, manufacturing, process or procedure, etc., to achieve the desired result, performed in a common function with object S2.


Selection of the Need to Satisfy Ease of achieving desired outcome:
The ease of achieving the desired result ranks third (3/10) on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is in an enhanced basic state of innovation-evolution, having already achieved ease of operation and change. Now, the focus is on ease of achieving the desired outcome by making the necessary adjustments to obtain the expected outcome, to improve the fulfillment of the desired goal.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Ease of achieving the desired Outcome' for Object S1, whether moving or stationary, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The number of functions or operations performed by OBJECT S1 per unit of time or other variable, relevant to perform a function with object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The elapsed time for a function or operation to be performed per unit of measure.
c. Production per unit of time or cost per unit of production, etc.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Productivity:
Productivity occupies the fourth (4/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is in an enhanced basic state of innovation-evolution, having already achieved ease of operation, change, and achieving results. Now, the focus is on productivity to ensure that the production and services delivered are maximized, with optimal resource utilization, to improve the fulfillment of the desired goal.
This will complete an enhanced basic state of innovation-evolution of Object S1.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Productivity' for Object S1, whether moving or stationary, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The energy used by moving OBJECT S1, moving or interacting to execute a task or function with Object S2 with which it relates.
b. The measure of the energy ability, or efficiency of moving OBJECT S1 to perform a task or function with the object S2 with which it interacts.
c. In classical mechanics, the measure of energy for a moving OBJECT S1 is determined by multiplying power applied per elapsed time or force applied per distance covered.

In other fields, use corresponding energy measurement.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Use of energy by moving:
The use of energy by moving object occupies the fifth (5/10) position in the innovation-evolution curve of an evaluated moving Object S1. The Object S1 is in the preliminary stages of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on use of energy by moving object to ensure that the production and services delivered are maximized, with efficient use of the energy of a moving object. This is done without compromising the basic state of innovation-evolution achieved, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Use of energy by moving object', for moving Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The energy used by OBJECT S1 stationary, interacting to execute a task or function with Object S2 with which it relates.
. b. The measure of the energy ability, or efficiency of stationary OBJECT S1 to perform a task or function with the object S2 with which it interacts.
c. In classical mechanics, the measure of energy for a stationary OBJECT S1 is determined by multiplying power applied per elapsed time.

In other fields, use corresponding energy measurement.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Use of energy by stationary object:
The use of energy by stationary object occupies the fifth (5/10) position in the innovation-evolution curve of an evaluated stationary Object S1. The Object S1 is in the early stages of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on use of energy by stationary object to ensure that the production and services delivered are maximized, with efficient use of the energy of a stationary object. This is done without compromising the basic state of innovation-evolution achieved, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.br> To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Use of energy by stationary object', for stationary Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The ability of OBJECT S1 to perform its expected functions in predictable ways and conditions, relevant to performing a function with object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The certainty that the events foreseen for OBJECT S1 will occur during the performance of a common function with object S2.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Reliability:
Reliability occupies the sixth (6/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is poised to enter a new phase of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on the reliable operation of a moving or stationary object to ensure the stable continuity of a function or process it is participates in. This is done without compromising the previously achieved state of innovation-evolution, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Reliability', for moving or stationary Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

Nature's L.I. identifies two conditions of adaptability or versatility for Object S1, one as a need to satisfy and the other as an undesirable effect. The need to satisfy is described below.
Need to Satisfy:
b. The degree to which OBJECT S1 correctly adapts to the variability of external changes, associated with object S2 with which it interacts.
c. The degree to which OBJECT S1 can be used in multiple ways and under various circumstances, relevant to perform a function with object S2 with which it interacts.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Adaptability or Versatility:
Adaptability or Versatility occupies the seventh (7/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is prepared to enter a new phase of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on the ability of a moving or stationary object to adapt to various operating conditions that may arise in a function or process it is involved in. This is done without compromising the previously achieved states of innovation-evolution, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Adaptability or Versatility', for moving or stationary Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The degree to which OBJECT S1 performs actions permanently and repeatedly, without the need for new parts or inputs, during the performance of a common function with object S2 with which it interacts.
b. The degree to which OBJECT S1 or associated system performs its functions without direct human action, relevant to performing a function with object S2 with which it interacts. The most basic level of automation is the use of a hand tool.
c. For intermediate levels, people position the tool or actuator, observe its operation, and interrupt or restart, as necessary.
d. For the highest level, the machine or function detects the required operation, configures the tool or actuator itself, and monitors its own operation.
e. The ultimate goal is the total autonomy of Object S1.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Extent of automation/ Autonomy:
Extent of automation/ Autonomy occupies the eighth (8/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving or stationary Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is prepared to enter a new phase of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on the ability of a moving or stationary object to progressively perform automated actions for a function or process it is involved in, until achieving the maximum allowed autonomy. This is done without compromising the previously achieved states of innovation-evolution, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving or stationary OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Extent of automation/ Autonomy', for moving or stationary Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list

a. The time during which moving OBJECT S1 performs an action with object S2.
b. The lifetime of moving OBJECT S1 that performs an action with object S2.
c. The average time between singularities or failures of moving OBJECT S1 performing an action with object S2. Also, durability.

Selection of the Need to Satisfy Duration of action of moving object:
Duration of action of moving object occupies the tenth (10/10) position on the innovation-evolution curve of a moving Object S1 under evaluation. Object S1 is prepared to enter a new phase of advanced innovation-evolution. Now, the focus is on the duration of the moving object's action for a function or process in which it is involved, which extends the expected satisfaction over time within the evaluated time and space. This is done without compromising the previously achieved states of innovation-evolution, with the aim of enhancing the fulfillment of the desired objective.
To advance to new states of satisfaction, it is necessary to change the innovation-evolution curve, applying innovation by imagination or imposition. See fundamentals of Aatrizinventor.
The Aatrizinventor algorithm requires the Innovation Team to select this need to satisfy if if they consider it essential. This should be based on their understanding of the actual state of innovation-evolution which the moving OBJECT S1 is in when interacting with OBJECT S2.
To support the Innovation Team's decision, the Aatrizinventor algorithm conducts a sensitivity analysis with the identified undesirable effects and the defined needs to satisfy. This allows for validation of whether selecting 'Duration of action of moving object', for moving Object S1, is the best decision or if there are other preceding or subsequent need to satisfy, that is advisable to evaluate.

Back to list